A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that become emblematic on the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they have been intended to gather Visible evidence of your wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Periods documented, describing how the two Males entered the h2o all through critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the positioning grew to become One of the more placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been covered intimately because of the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as readers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of arranging documents, maps, and disorders attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other lengthy once the authorized charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of all-natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.